Just curious if anyone has had any success in getting more than 1% closing costs for FHA buyer?

Views: 1884

Replies to This Discussion

Darrell thanks for giving your input  it is good to know, from your side of the fence, that a variance of even 3-6% will be considered if the Sales Price is sufficient.
I have had success with getting more than 1% of the purchase price toward Buyer's closing costs paid.  In one case, the Buyer was obtaining a USDA loan.  We got approval for 4.3% to the Buyer's closing costs (this was Wells Fargo).  In another case (this time the Buyer was getting FHA financing), we got 3.1% (this was Citi).  I have found that I have generally needed to specifically ask the Negotiator to request a variance from HUD.
Just an update on my file - Today we received the approval of the buyer's request to receive 3% towards their closing costs.  I am very excited!  We are now on to closing!  The process was very simple and only took 10 business days from the date we sent in the est HUD1 to B of A - have to say B of A has been amazing in this transaction.

Darrell, I just sent you an email with a question - thank you

 

I haven't personally had to request a variance for the closing costs. However, I was advised that if they approve the variance for the 3% when the buyer is going FHA, the purchase price must be at full appraised value.

Does HUD require that I provide an est HUD1 with all the buyers fees.  How can I since escrow does not have the Escrow Instructions from the buyers Lender.  Do we just guess on the fees?  HELP Please



Darrell Powell said:

Since I work for HUD in the National Servicing Center and I approve and deny variances I wanted to give my input.  It is correct that per Mortgagee Letter 2008-43 HUD will pay up to 1% of the buyers closing cost as long as the buyer has FHA financing.  While there is no written rule or guideline HUD has approved variances of up to 6% buyer concessions regardless of financing type, when this happens the buyer is usually financing his closing cost and HUD is netting well in excess of 88%.  It is very common that HUD approves 3% concessions for buyers, again regardless of their type of financing, but the key is HUD has never approved concessions for a non-FHA financed buyer where the net is not at least 84%.  Every case is reviewed independently and my statements here do not guarantee or imply that every buyer will be approved for concessions not to exceed 6% if HUD is netting 84%.  If anyone ever has any questions please feel free to email me, [email protected].  If you have the FHA case number that is what I really need or the complete property address, HUD cannot search by a lender/servicer loan number.

Yes, just had 3% approved today through a variance must be full appraised value and meeting their min net 88% in this case since this was the first 30 days of the marketing period of the ATP.

Did you need to provide the Lender with a HUD1 showing all of the buyers costs?

Norene

Paola Martinsen said:

Yes, just had 3% approved today through a variance must be full appraised value and meeting their min net 88% in this case since this was the first 30 days of the marketing period of the ATP.
No, i didnt have to. I just provided seller side HUD. But for final approval on FHA short sales they usually do want to see both sides, once we have docs. I have had Wells request both sides prior to approving so we had to get a GFE from buyers lender but thats only happened to me once.

Too funny... B of A told me it is HUD's requirement to submi the variance with a HUD1 showing all of the buyers closing costs.  I though they were pulling my leg AGAIN :-)

Thank you

Here is my take on that: HUD has guidelines but every servicer interprets them differently and enforces them differently. For any questions about the proper guidelines I always contact HUDS servicing center and if what the servicer is requesting is impossible to get or they are taking too long then I get HUD involved to enforce the correct guideline/procedure. The guideline is the same but the servicer is the one that is inconsistent.

Norene M Rogers said:

Too funny... B of A told me it is HUD's requirement to submi the variance with a HUD1 showing all of the buyers closing costs.  I though they were pulling my leg AGAIN :-)

Thank you

RSS

Members

© 2024   Created by Short Sale Superstars LLC.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

********************************** like buttons ************************