I have a potential seller who has a second home in California, that is 200K upside down, one loan. It is with Citibank. He has assets, good income, with no hardship. He may let it go into foreclosure. Has anyone been able to close a short sale when the seller has no true hardship, can afford the monthly payment, and has assets? I'm leary about seller providing tax returns and financials, just to have the bank decline, and pursue a judicial foreclosure. Any thoughts?

Views: 1698

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ask youself why a lender would allow a short sale if someone can obviously afford their mortgage?  Why has he stopped making payments?  Is it because he can AFFORD his first home and not his second?  Why wouldn't he rent it?  I ask myself a series of these questions before I take a short sale listing.

In the newsletter today

While the bank may not agree to a short sale, it's probably worth a try.  They may ask for money to close, but there's probably a good chance that it will be less than the full amount that they will go after in the case of a foreclosure.  

 

If you're willing to do the work for a sale that may not happen, it may be in the sellers best interest.

Gabe's right.  I bet there's a few folks on this site that have gotten it done but I'd say that generally speaking there needs to be a hardship.

If the seller is going to walk away & you are no deficiency state, similar to us here in the Seattle are, then it is about which option hurts the lender the least. If the seller has nothing to lose by foreclosure except their credit- the banl has very little leverage.

 

If the seller is not making payments they may also be able be to contribute at closing to make the short sale happen if their credit matters to them.

I have had 2 short sales approved and closed without any true hardship.  The bank is not getting paid and appears to accept a quick solution over the foreclosure option.  Both were stand alone 1st with no option for deficiencies.....

 

I'm with Dawn here.  I'm in Palm Springs area of California and I will take a Short Sale like this, because depending on the area it's in, we are decimated.  If the Seller is absolutely willing to foreclose, the notes will go away anyway. I can usually get the Lenders to see that if they leave it vacant in some areas, it will become a "crack house" and by the time they get it, it's ruined completely.  Now..if they will net more by Foreclosing or even not..they WILL want money from someone.  New law says they cannot DEMAND it from Sellers as a condition of close, so I prepare my Buyers to have a reserve because there WILL be money to be thrown in and it's not coming from me!

T -

 

I have closed several exactly like this one throughout SoCal - and mostly in Palm Desert / LaQuinta.  Some were being short sold by owners with SIGNIFICANT assets.

 

Handled correctly, it can happen.

 

Best,

 

Thom Colby

Broker / Negotiator

Newport Beach, CA

Under the newly signed law SB458, there is no deficiency or promissory note allowed as a condition of short sale approval in CA.  However, the alternative is non-approval.

 

I still say, try.............

 

Thom Colby

 

 

I appreciate the advise. I decided not to work with this one. The potential seller was not willing to provide any financial documentation to the bank.
Smart - that would have received a "decline" !!

RSS

Members

© 2024   Created by Short Sale Superstars LLC.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

********************************** like buttons ************************