Here's what I think......
In Florida it is perfectly legal to give commission rebates. The rebate just has to be disclosed to the parties of the contract (buyer and seller). By the way, 40 States allow commission rebates.
Can a lender stop this from happening?
And what about the "Arms Length Transaction Affidavit (ALT)? The wording on these can be ambiguous to say the least.
The ALT from Suntrust states:"
The ALT from Wells Fargo reads:
Neither of these Affidavits, in my opinion***, would prohibit the seller from receiving a commission rebate. And when we team these with the Florida rebate law stating we only have to disclose the rebate to the parties of the contract.....the issue cloubs even further.
Is a rebate coming from the Broker "proceeds of the sale"?
And what about RESPA? RESPA requires that all monies related to the transaction be on the HUD. However, RESPA doesn't apply to all transactions including cash purchases and mortgages that are not Federally related
By the way. the Department of Justice is all FOR commission rebates as a commission rebate saves the consumer money in a real estate transaction. Rebates also help Brokers compete.
These are difficult questions and I think the courts will have to decide. What say you?
***I am NOT an Attorney. Nor do I play one on TV. This article is just my opinion. Do not rely on it as legal advice. Don't give your seller a rebate and tell your Broker ofrthe Judge that "Broker Bryant said it was OK". I didn't. What I'm really saying is SEEK LEGAL ADVICE.
Are you facing foreclosure in Florida?
Do NOT be foreclosed on! Avoid foreclosure. Short Sales DO close.
Want to find out more? www.CentralFloridaShortSales.com
***I am NOT an Attorney nor do I play one on TV. Click the button below for my Bio.
Copyright © 2011 http://www.brokerbryant.com/ | All Rights Reserved
Comment
This is an interesting question. My first reaction would be that the receipt of any money by the seller, in the form of the commission rebate or otherwise, would be in direct violation of the terms of the lender's short sale approval letter. Most, if not all, approval letters explicitly state that the seller is to receive no proceeds from the transaction. While viable arguments can be made in support of both sides of the issue, I don't think the risk of a potential lawsuit is worth the reward of a partial commission. Regardless, I would disclose the existence of the seller rebate to the lender prior to receiving short sale approval.
Disclaimer: I am not an attorney and this is merely my personal opinion.
© 2024 Created by Short Sale Superstars LLC. Powered by
Short Sale Superstars, LLC and www.ShortSaleSuperstars.com does not endorse the real estate agents, loan officers, attorneys, real estate brokers and other participants listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs, blog entries and forums are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a short sale. Short Sale Superstars, LLC takes no responsibility for the content on these pages that are written by the members of this community.
You need to be a member of Short Sale Superstars to add comments!
Join Short Sale Superstars