Maybe this is a rookie question - but I'm confused.  Our offer is 3.5% higher than the payoff for the WF 1st.  But commissions and fees are over 6%.  Yet the negotiator on the first just said   "the purchase price is higher than our payoff, so the borrower just needs to negotiate with the 2nd lien"

 

Is that a normal response?  If so, how do I proceed?

Views: 30

Replies to This Discussion

Rob,

 

Hmmm...   Someone here is confused and it may be the negotiator on the first hasn't seen the fees...  I'm in a similar situation and my WFB negotiator understood immediately and gave me approval with payoff instructions of what they'll allow the second.  Something isn't quite right.   Have you already spoken with the second lien holder yet?

 

Mike Ackerman

Zephyr Real Estate

415-307-5850

I would call back Wells Fargo and speak with the negotiator is possible to explain to them that the net is going to be below their payoff and to issue approval with allowance for 2nd lienholder.  The negotiator you spoke with is probably so busy they did not realize the net is below their payoff.

Thanks MIchael & Kari - glad to learn I'm not crazy.  Funny that I just received a fax from the 2nd - also WF - with two interesting items.  First, they define what a short sale is - and by their own words this is short as you both confirm - the key sentence "sales price less closing costs". 

 

The 1st WF lien, in their original email response saying that we are n"ot short" said I should order a payoff - so I did again, and thanks to late fees, another missed payment, etc, we're another $11,000 shorter then the HUD I previously submitted, and now the payoff and purchase price are neck and neck with purchase price just a bit above the payoff.  I'll report back on how the negotiator responds.  Thanks again.

RSS

Members

© 2024   Created by Short Sale Superstars LLC.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

********************************** like buttons ************************