Tags:
I've been in this position with Wells as Servicer for the FHA 1st and Citi as 2nd. Each conditioned their approval on approval from the other. Then, they basically act as thought their don't see a problem with this. Wells btw does not treat there own 2nd in this fashion, just a not-on-us 2nd.
I think that the 1st, Wells, is being unreasonable. They should go first.
I escalated up-the-line within compliance claiming that this was a potential fair-lending violation, becuase similarly situated borrowers could receive disparate treatment, potentially with a demographic overlay. Eg, two Wells 1st, treated differently because one has a Wells 2nd, one does not. Or, one has a 2nd, one does not. One gets denied, one gets assistance.
I was able to get someone in compliance to help us get this unstuck. I'm not sure that the fair-lending argument was strong, but I was able to get Wells to go first.
Tanya,
The reason this comes up is because the FHA requires that the 1st have "reasonable belief that the 2nd will releae". And, Wells interprets "reasonable belief" as "has already happened". Unreasonable of Wells, but maybe they have been dinged by HUD audits in the past.
The ATP is for the sellers, only, does not need a buyer to be active. If you get the ATP, you are good for 120 days, if you need to get another buyer.
FHA will offer up to $2,500, but any other party can made additional payments.
© 2024 Created by Short Sale Superstars LLC. Powered by
Short Sale Superstars, LLC and www.ShortSaleSuperstars.com does not endorse the real estate agents, loan officers, attorneys, real estate brokers and other participants listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs, blog entries and forums are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a short sale. Short Sale Superstars, LLC takes no responsibility for the content on these pages that are written by the members of this community.