I am working on a deal where Citi is the second lien holder for less than $15,000.  Has anyone experienced them placing a 30 deed restriction on a property when they are in second position.  The buyer is considering paying Bank of America its full balance to avoid the deed restriction but doesn't want to make the offer if the second can restrict his resale of the property.

Views: 223

Replies to This Discussion

Whomever is being 'shorted' in my opinion could place a deed restriction.

In my opinion the 2nd shouldn't have that much say so, but.....you may need to agree to get the 2nd's approval. Seriously, by the time you close, relist it and close it again you'll be over 30 days (theoretically) so shouldn't be that big of a deal.

Appraisals are so tight  the banks shouldn't be worrying about this anyway, and investors buying fixing and reselling are keeping the market moving.  And the rehabbers make it possible for first timers to buy well appointed homes. The banks remain a bit kooky. Uhhh..in my opinion.

What do you mean by "deed restriction"?  

Wendy, I think he is referring to the lien holder placing a restriction on the new deed, that it cannot be transferred to a new owner for the first 30 days (in this case, I suppose a lien holder could say 60 or 90, or whatever). Seeing it in California, lien holders trying to prevent flipping.

OK, that term is confusing...  we use it a lot for architectural guidelines around here :)

Yep. Agreed!

RSS

Members

© 2024   Created by Short Sale Superstars LLC.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

********************************** like buttons ************************