Tags:
are you dual agent? Although they cannot demand..I had another bank, not wells, look at my commssion as a dual agent..and hint. I had already assumed it would go into the pot..1st approved 6%, a 'assumed' 4% would be agreed at..and ended up contributing that amount to get the deal done. Would not have done it if it was not dual, and liveable. On the other hand, an argument would be that you may have to pay taxes on this commission at the full rate, so why should you. The negotiator may accept that argument
I am still not clear with my accountant on if I am going to bite that extra payout in taxes..the hud shows full commission, but a 'contribution' from the selling agent of x amount...
First - -don't hate the negotiator, they are hourly persons trained to read BS like that to you from the scripts they are given (remember, they are called "negotiators" for a reason).
Try these lines first: 1 - “Let me check with my broker to see if we can agree to that” – again, puts you in the “same boat” as your negotiator, middle-person checking with a “boss”. Call them back the next day and tell them your Broker will not allow you to reduce your commission, and, ask the negotiator "What do you think we should do" or
2 – “If I can get the Buyer to increase his/her sales price by 1% or 2%, so that the investor on this receives the same
NET, can we get the 6% agreed to in the signed sales contract and listing agreement”
or
3 – “I spoke to my broker and he said we can NOT agree to reduce the commission on this. If this buyer walks, will you at least keep the file open so we can find a new buyer, one who will cover your shortage?”
I would start with those, then ESCALATE your file ASAP!!!! I would also STRONGLY suggest you find out who the investor is on the note and speak directly with them.
Again, never any real reason you should give up your commission on a short sale....NEGOTIATE, NEGOTIATE, NEGOTIATE!!!!!
I have [email protected]
Thanks for the reply Jose!
I use this information all the time and in fact already provided it to Wells Fargo.
They respond saying "we are not asking you to reduce your commission, you are getting your commission , but contributing a portion (2%) to us, and it is not a Fannie Mae loan either . . .
If this is a Freddie Mac loan, the rule still applies :)
but...if it's a conventional then there might be a possibility it applies to that as well (i've been reading information regarding that). Wells Fargo is using different language, but at the end of the day they are still asking you to reduce your commission, it's apparent they are cutting corners from the guide lines.
I would even suggest to be as bold as to forward some of your conversations with wells fargo directly to Freddie Mac or even to NAR. I'm sure you would get a letter from them directed to Wells Fargo that better be cautious of what they ask for. Let wells fargo know that you will take this as far as you need to for a fair transaction. (I've done something similar to that and it helped.)
"contribution" PPPFFFFF! yeah right, anyway wells fargo tries to put it they are still asking for a reduction.
Sherrilee Denton said:Thanks for the reply Jose!
I use this information all the time and in fact already provided it to Wells Fargo.
They respond saying "we are not asking you to reduce your commission, you are getting your commission , but contributing a portion (2%) to us, and it is not a Fannie Mae loan either . . .
© 2024 Created by Short Sale Superstars LLC. Powered by
Short Sale Superstars, LLC and www.ShortSaleSuperstars.com does not endorse the real estate agents, loan officers, attorneys, real estate brokers and other participants listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs, blog entries and forums are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a short sale. Short Sale Superstars, LLC takes no responsibility for the content on these pages that are written by the members of this community.