What percentage of value is the tradtional cut off for counters

I believe its pretty commonly known (or assumed) that many lenders will accept no less than 86% of "value" (net) on their negotiated ss.  At least I have heard that from several negotiators and other ss agents.  My question is: Does anyone know where the line in the sand is for a traditional short sale negotiator to say, "that is outside of investor guidelines and I cant even counter the offer."  I have had several lately (due to inflated BPOs - I know its hard to believe, but there are agents who do it on purpose) where the Wells negotiator simply said, "that is so far I out, I cant counter."  Ideas? 

Again not all cases, just rule of thumb kind of thing.  The Wells folks are great at allowing me to dispute because they are all starting to see that racket that BPOs have become amongst REO agents.  I have shown them a few cases of inflated BPOs and they were blown away, and then they said, "well, that makes sense why they do it."

Views: 964

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Jeff,

I really like the heads up to the negotiator that the agent gets REO listing from their company and that you believe it might be a conflict and could they "in the interest of all concerned," assign another BPO agent. 

 

I think that should be the standard line for these where we clearly know this could/will happen.  In fact, when the BPO agents call me from now on, I am going to ask them a few questions: "Do you, your company, or affiliates take or accept REO listings from this lender/servicer?"  If so, then I can inform the negotiator there is a potential conflict or non-arms length relationship here and we should protect everyone by reassigning the BPO.  I believe that, at a minimum, will become standard operation procedure for my team. 

 

Cheers

RSS

Members

© 2024   Created by Short Sale Superstars LLC.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

********************************** like buttons ************************