I have two separate customers who are way upside down in their mortgages, but they're current on their payments and can likely stay that way. If we were to begin offers for sale to the lenders (one is Chase and the other is BOA, and both are single-lien situations) would they consider our offer?
Alex Krumm
Re/Max Alliance Group
Broker Associate
GRI, Certified Distressed Property Expert
Winner, Five Star® Best In Customer Satisfaction: 2010, 2011
941-234-3597 Direct
941-954-5454 Office
941-341-0192 Fax
Replies
The best thing to do with ANY lender is to have a package that is precise, detailed and PROVES facts. The more that you add that is factual, the better the chance that it will be approved with no hassle. The next thing to watch after proving the facts is to make sure that everything is easily legible to the lender. We spend a lot of time increasing the size of the writing with our copier and making sure that the borders are not being cut-off. If you get one stall from a lender that they can not read something or they are skeptical about what has been written because you didn't PROVE the fact, you are off their radar for the next few weeks. So, moral is, spend a lot of time proofing and re-proofing the package and asking the question, how can I prove that? If it takes waiting to get something like a police report or a divorce decree or employment or unemployment letter, then wait before you send in the package. It will be worth it in the long run.
Short sales on investment properties where the seller is current on payments do get approved. However my experience has been that the seller had to participate in the loss with a cash contribution, prom note or both.
On primary properties there is usually not an issue. Especially if there is a hardship. Medical issues and death of a spouse trump just about any short sale guidelines. A divorce decree is also a good one for overcoming the "must be delinquent" that some lenders throw at you.
Thom Colby Newport Beach CA said:
Gena and John -
In both of your examples, you said the seller / borrower was using "savings". I think that's the reason both are being declined. If a borrower has money in savings, why would the lender take the hit?
Thom Colby
Broker
Newport Beach CA
Gena pasquini said: