I went to a Short Sales & Tax Implications seminar presented by a real estate attorney and was advised that in the state of FL waiving the deficiency judgment does not preclude a bank from attempting to
recover balance owed. Unless the approval specifies no deficiency judgment on the mortgage and note the investors can still collect on the note. While the deficiency may have been waived on the mortgage the instrument is just collateral for the note; therefore, the promise to pay as agreed to on the note
itself can still be called due. In essence, the borrower could potentially receive a 1099 and still have a deficiency judgment. Has anyone else heard of this?
You need to be a member of Short Sale Superstars to add comments!
Replies
Maria, similar to what Bryant and Amanda said above, with a short sale you are reducing your liability and possibly eliminating it NOT SO with a foreclosure.
It appears that the deficiency is being forgiven which is what you want BUT you are posting bits and pieces of the letter and peppering it with your own comments and not breaking it down in paragraphs making it a bit hard to read and understand. ASK an attorney to interpret it for you, it may cost you $200 or so to do but you would at least know for sure or ask your real estate agent for guidance.
I know that what you are going through is very stressful, just take a deep breath and try and sort through all the information you are being presented with. Also, go back and read the first two lines of this post.
The above is not intended to be legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV.
Maria said:
Paul Antonelli said:
What does Verticrest will not pursue a deficiency Judgment on the deficient balance means?
http://www.forecloseddreams.com/recourse_states
Hi Amanda,
In your defense, I have heard attorneys state the above as well...here in California, the Short Sale Lender was doing exactly that. They were issuing a 1099 (c) and then going after borrower for the deficiency. Wrong?? Absolutely, on so many different levels. Most Lenders walk away and call it a day...It really depends on the note and the Lender. Remember, anyone can sue any one for anything at any time...Doesn't make it right. This is why California passed a law for all holders of 1st mortgages who accept a short sale on a home that qualifies as the borrower's primary residence disallowing them to come after a deficiency. I am seeing very clear deficiency waivers in short sale approval letters now that I had not seen before without requesting that the deficiency language be there...
http://www.forecloseddreams.com/recourse_states
Maria, you said the letter states:"Vericrest will not pursue a deficiency Judgment on the deficient Balance". I agree with all the respondents who have stated that this constitutes a release. You should accept that verbiage and move immediately to closing.
There is an important tactical, as opposed to legal, issue you should consider. While there is some comfort in getting the most absolutely water tight perfect wording possible, I believe that requesting a clarification whether the release you have constitutes absolute, full, complete and irrevocable release has a significantly greater chance of hurting than helping you, because what happens if the bank comes back and says no, it does not. Now you've gone from a fairly water tight release to no release at all.
As to the 1099 I agree with my colleugues who have said it is not a waiver. And remember that your lien holder has the right to amend its tax return, so pursuing you for a deficiency, after amending the 1099, would not be contradictory. I also agree with John Brassner who says that having the 1099 can only help - depending on the timing and circumstances, it may enable you to raise estoppel (in its various forms including laches)(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel) as one of many defenses.
As always, with all legal issues, you are advised to consult a lawyer.