Question: I submitted an offer on a short sale which took 2 months for approval and were schedule to close, however, a day before closing the listing agent decides to lower my commission because according to her our office does not pay what she pays, she did not tell me this when the offer was made or accepted and the commission is advertised with the higher commission split, the agent's broker and her have said that they will cancel/postpone the closing and will only close it if I take less of a commission. The buyer, seller and seller's lender are ready to close. I will not take less because I find it unethical and I believe they have no right to cancel a closing. What are your thoughts?
Thank you
Tags:
Replies are closed for this discussion.
xx
I agree with Bryant. There is a process. Let and the commission goes in escrow while you file a complaint with the board. It's per MLS. They could have stated 50/50 of short sale lender approved commission in the MLS, but if they didn't sounds like listing agent needs to take the hit.
In any case, they can't hold up the closing over it.
close the transaction first then go after them for the higher commission.
Im glad i did work out (or looks like it will). Im curious though, what does your office pay out to cooperating agents on short sales?
They have no right to cancel a closing, they need to remember that the transaction is between the buyer & seller, not brokers & agents. This is a perfect case to take to your board for mediation. They might want to read the Code of Ethics, Standards of Practice, Article 3, Standard of Practice 3-2. I am on our professional standards committee here in Wisconsin, and something like this would positively come before us! Shame on the agent, shame on the broker.
You should always check with your broker and board when something isnt right. I question anything that I never heard of before. You cant make your own rules in this business.
Most MLS' are the same based on NAR Core MLS Rules - Our MLS Rules state:
7.18.2 Lender Approval Listings
Compensation offered through the MLS to cooperating brokers on listings which require lender approval (commonly referred to as "short sale" listings) is for the amount published therein unless the listing broker indicates on the MLS the following: (a) the fact that the sale and gross commission are subject to lender approval; and (b) the amount or method by which the compensation offered through the MLS will be reduced if the lender reduces the gross commission. This section does not allow an additional reduction from the commission offered for items such as a short sale negotiator fee or other administrative costs of the transaction. Any reductions from the commission offered for such items should be factored in as a reduced amount the listing broker initially offers to a cooperating broker and may not be made a condition of the offer.
It looks like you got the issue corrected, but always know the Listing Agent MUST put in the MLS agent remarks, (b) the amount or method by which the compensation offered through the MLS will be reduced if the lender reduces the gross commission.
Best of luck !
Thom, Just for clarity; 'It looks like you got the issue corrected, but always know the Listing Agent MUST put in the MLS agent remarks, (b) the amount or method by which the compensation offered through the MLS will be reduced if the lender reduces the gross commission."
This only applies if the listing broker chooses to reduce the co-broke if the commission is adjusted by the lender. The listing broker can sill leave this clause out and just guarantee to the co-broke. That's what I do. No games
My personal opinion is that this clause is pure foolishness and destroys the integrity of the MLS. Co-brokes should be paid as offered in the MLS. I see co-broke in my area of as high as 5% on short sales then they conveniently add the above clause. that should not be allowed.
Bryant -
I absolutely agree with you. I believe the clause in the MLS Rules is a safety net for those unknowing agents on the buyer's side who get taken by LAs who want to reduce commissions whether the lender reduces it or not.
Like you, I put the Co-op amount in the MLS that I am offering. But, I still use the recommended language as a safety net just in case we have an unreasonable lender. I've even increased the co-op amount when one agent brought three buyers and closed on three of my short sale listings over a 4 month period!
After sitting on Pro-Standards as a Board of Director member for reviews of commission disputes, the number of disputes for this issue is increasing - the language in the MLS becomes a big "Factor".
never never let a dispute with another agent jeopardize the transaction, Close the Sale, take all of your documentation and go file a claim with ur local Board. Make sure you involve your broker in this discussion.
Your broker and the other broker may be able to solve the problem without going to the board.
Besides some commission is better than no commission.
Good luck
© 2024 Created by Short Sale Superstars LLC. Powered by
Short Sale Superstars, LLC and www.ShortSaleSuperstars.com does not endorse the real estate agents, loan officers, attorneys, real estate brokers and other participants listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs, blog entries and forums are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a short sale. Short Sale Superstars, LLC takes no responsibility for the content on these pages that are written by the members of this community.