Hello. This is my first post here, and I wonder if the superstars can help me. There's a question in my Activerain SFR group that I think needs some authoritative answer. The question is, can an agent be the listing agent for a short sale property owned by the same agent? ( I think I mangled that - lol.)
I believe the agent can, as long as the same agent doesn't benefit (get paid commission) from the sale. I know I read this somewhere, but can't cite chapter and verse. Can you help? Thank you so much!
Tags:
The rules do keep changing! I think we're all in agreement that you as the homeowner will not receive a commission.
Who is the lien holder? If it's BofA or Wells Fargo I will contact someone I know there and get a real answer for you on the issue of whether you CAN be the listing agent. Personally, I don't know of any laws against it, just a question of how the bank handles the commission.
Barbara Rice
702-523-7907
Most banks don't want you associated with your own short...you are an agent and also the banks borrower, my suggestion is hand this to a trusted friend or BIC to see you through.
I'm still very new, and I learn something from almost every post I read here. I love short sales. This is the only market I know, and I am determined to do very well.
My first question is this... how would the bank know, if an agent is getting a referral fee from a short sale? The referral fee is NOT on the HUD Settlement...
If the banks had their way, there would be a law that states "every agent must accept a short sale listing and NOT charge any commission out of the bank's proceeds, period". But, there is no law. The short sale is based on a hardship. If an agent has a hardship, that agent's property should be approved for the short. It's in the bank's interest also. It shouldn't matter if the listing agent is the owner (but I know, it does matter to the bank). The bank may not like the owner/agent listing. The bank may not like the owner/agent's brokerage getting a commission, the bank may not like the owner/agent's brokerage paying that agent their split of that commission. But is there a LAW against it?
Very eager to learn more!
All the best,
~Kieran~
Hi, ladies & gents!
I'm very pleasantly surprised to find a well rounded discussion of the question I posted earlier.
Just a point of clarification--I'm not the subject of the short sale, but thank you for your concern. I posted here because the question was asked by a blogger in my ActiveRain SFR Group but didn't get traction, and I have not seen this addressed very well over there. There is so much misinformation out there that I truly want to know based on the collective experience here. I wish I could post this discussion over there.
I apologize if I'm not responding to individual comments, but I've learned so much from this thread. I have the theoretical, but not the practical knowledge when it comes to short sales. I do want to go to reliable sources when in doubt. Thank you so much!
- Yolanda
I'm still very new, and I learn something from almost every post I read here. I love short sales. This is the only market I know, and I am determined to do very well.
My first question is this... how would the bank know, if an agent is getting a referral fee from a short sale? The referral fee is NOT on the HUD Settlement...
If the banks had their way, there would be a law that states "every agent must accept a short sale listing and NOT charge any commission out of the bank's proceeds, period". But, there is no law. The short sale is based on a hardship. If an agent has a hardship, that agent's property should be approved for the short. It's in the bank's interest also. It shouldn't matter if the listing agent is the owner (but I know, it does matter to the bank). The bank may not like the owner/agent listing. The bank may not like the owner/agent's brokerage getting a commission, the bank may not like the owner/agent's brokerage paying that agent their split of that commission. But is there a LAW against it?
Very eager to learn more!
All the best,
~Kieran~
Hey Bryant,
Yes I do understand your point. I have seen on the approval letters, that the bank gives instruction to the title agent. The title agent can't give a dime to the seller. I still do not see how the bank can instruct the broker not to pay its agent. I'd love to hear from an attorney or two on this matter. I do understand and appreciate everyone that has shared experience and opinion on this matter. But it's my belief that if the bank allows an agent to list their own short sale, and that brokerage collects a commission, I don't think the bank has ANY authority to get in that broker's business how they handle their money.
If thats the case, the bank should deny the short sale and insist on a brokerage with no vested interest in the deal what so ever.
Just my opinion. From the few short sales I have closed to date... the banks make it clear their stand is 'them against us'. If your broker is ok with you listing your own short sale, then go for it. I think this type of decision is totally up to the OP at any brokerage. Again, I do know I am a newb.
All the best,
~Kieran~
Bryant Tutas said:
Kieran. Because the owner normally has to sign a form stating they are not receiving any funds from the transaction. To sign this and then collect a fee anyway could very well be considered fraud.
Is this the principal/agent/sellers primary residence or other? I would think that if it is their primary, they should have someone else list it (because we know if they do it themselves there's no commission) and they would be eligible for
the $1500 relocation expense ($3000 if HAFA) so they could get something after all.
Kieran. I guess the question becomes ..Would you sign a form saying you are not getting ANY proceeds from the sale and then do it anyway? And is a commission coming from the broker "proceeds of the sale"? I don't believe the lenders are going to waste time and money going after folks for doing this BUT does that make it right? I agree that the lender would have a hard time defending their stance in a court of law.
In Florida it is perfectly legal to give commission rebates after the closing and off the HUD. It just has to be disclosed to the parties of the contract (buyer and seller). Can I lender stop this from happening? Are these proceeds of the sale?
Difficult questions and I think the courts would have to decide.
Jeff:
I've never read this anywhere, but can tell you we had a short sale this year (may have been Wells Fargo but I'm not sure). The buyer was a woman who was a Realtor. The buyer's agent was her husband ... also a Realtor. They disclosed their relationship from the very beginning of the transaction, and had done similar transactions in the past. We got down to the approval stage and they denied the short sale and said we had to replace the BUYER. Replacing the Realtor was not an option.
Jeff Payne said:
Ellen, please direct us to where you found this out? Arms length? Does that mean that a family member could not be the listing agent on a short sale?
© 2024 Created by Short Sale Superstars LLC. Powered by
Short Sale Superstars, LLC and www.ShortSaleSuperstars.com does not endorse the real estate agents, loan officers, attorneys, real estate brokers and other participants listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs, blog entries and forums are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a short sale. Short Sale Superstars, LLC takes no responsibility for the content on these pages that are written by the members of this community.